Pinnacle wrote:https://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=76362014&userid=671390&signature=TvU1i0ekvHv3dt1wiNtcSA is this fair? I feel as if it's slightly unfair on my end. I may not care too much about items but I still want it to be fair
Generally items that come as a set are valued together, which is the case for some of the items on your side - but if you're looking at the overall value of your items, you'll want to consider that each item/item set is worth roughly a common-uncommon pet from around the time it was released. In this case - I don't even really need to look back at the archives to see that this isn't fair to you. To really figure it out you'll want to double check when each item set was released - then add up the value of all of your items based on the year and month they were released. :) I unfortunately don't have the time to check for you myself, but this should be a starting point!
recherché. wrote:recherché. wrote:recherché. wrote:thoughts on
this trade??
this one too?
- Leah
please help uwu
The first one looks a bit unfair to them - the cupid set is incomplete so it's not quite worth as much as all the pieces together, and one of the Christmas items is from 2010 while the other is from 2011. I'd say it's close, but overall an early 10 uncommon seems a bit hefty for the pieces they're offering on. :) It's not wildly unfair, but I'd say it's a touch unfair to their side.
As for the second trade, it seems pretty reasonable considering the cake is from early 2011 and the bags from Christmas - I think the 2011 butterfly wolves are more than enough for the bags, and everything else looks like it adds up fine to cover the slice of cake as well. :) Items are tricky to give an exact value, but I'd say in this case I don't see a clear advantage to one side or the other.