The "Is this a fair trade?" Thread

[cyanic]

how does this look, thank you to anyone who helps!
trades/viewtrade.php?id=76110970&userid=616959&signature=jjPI5ksQYE-KeKUWFkZTSg

[nobxdy]

.

It was unfair to you. Your Nick Cake Dog is worth 6-7 '09 rares, their side is only worth 3 '09 rares/about a Tier 1 Advent list. ^^

how does this look, thank you to anyone who helps!
trades/viewtrade.php?id=76110970&userid=616959&signature=jjPI5ksQYE-KeKUWFkZTSg

Their rare dog was extended into mid-late 2009 (originally from 2008), so they're overpaying. Your cat was also extended into April 2010.

Demand is up to you, and if you're happy with this or not. ^^

[in act ive]

.

It was unfair to you. Your Nick Cake Dog is worth 6-7 '09 rares, their side is only worth 3 '09 rares/about a Tier 1 Advent list. ^^

(With that being said, this would be overpay as well? I feel dumb because if that's over, then this is obviously way over... Maybe the cake dog would be fair?

[nobxdy]

-snip-

(With that being said, this would be overpay as well? I feel dumb because if that's over, then this is obviously way over... Maybe the cake dog would be fair?

Yes, you'd still be overpaying.
Your side is worth a September List / Light Leopard tier, their side is still only worth about a Tier 1 / Tier 2 Advent List.

Demand is really up to you and your trading partner. If you're both happy with the trade, then it's fair. (:

[Feralfish]

hey, I was wondering if this was fair demand and rarity wise...
trades/viewtrade.php?id=76112881&userid=812148&signature=vfADc1OtNKeWL9vHxJPChA

[spirited away]

fair?

[nobxdy]

fair?

Considering the years those items came out, and valuing them at an uncommon each, it's unfair to you;

Reindeer Sleigh = Christmas 2011
Candy Basket and Hearts = Valentine's Day 2011
Little Bats (x2) = Halloween 2012
Fireflies (x4) = Slumber Party 2013

They're not old enough, or rare enough, to be worth 2 2009 rares + the add on your side. They actually wouldn't even add up to 1 '09 rare together.

[stormsurge0]

which one could get more demand wise? trades/viewtrade.php?id=76095660&userid=887698&signature=1PEhMOZR5lEo1sYIaYec8g or trades/viewtrade.php?id=76062563&userid=887698&signature=he0LVaguPKFGS99JoezyyQ

not to sound impatient but does anyone know? I don't want to keep them waiting because it seems like I'm ignoring it

[nobxdy]

which one could get more demand wise? trades/viewtrade.php?id=76095660&userid=887698&signature=1PEhMOZR5lEo1sYIaYec8g or trades/viewtrade.php?id=76062563&userid=887698&signature=he0LVaguPKFGS99JoezyyQ

not to sound impatient but does anyone know? I don't want to keep them waiting because it seems like I'm ignoring it

Rarity wise, the second trade is overpaying more than the first trade.

Your dragon is worth the 3 month rule / another '09 rare.
Trade 1: their side is worth 3 '09 rares (valuing the zodiac at 1 '09 rare)
Trade 2: their side is worth 8 '09 rares

It's honestly up to you how you value them demand wise, and how you value your Dragon demand wise. it's up to you which trade you want. We can't give you an exact answer on what they go for as everyone values things differently. ^^

[Chevelle000]

https://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=76107785&userid=229785&signature=yZE4nLu0vnFd7Xd_GdcEww

Is this fair?? Thanks in advance ☺️☺️❤️

It's unfair to you. Your Store Pet is worth 2 '09 rares + '10 rare, their bunny is only worth 1 '09 rare (originally from Easter 2010). ^^

I agree ^^
Unfair to the 2011 Store Pet.

Bunny = Easter 2010 = 2 2010 Rares = 1 2009 Rare

2011 Store Pet = 2 2009 Rares + 1 2010 Rare

Thank you so much!!!!