*dogs&stuff* wrote:Very unfair to you, the sitting cats can go for quite a bit and it just being an '09 uc makes it worth 2 '11 rares
The cat is an extended release and only worth a 2010 uncommon or a 2012 rare. The dog is an 09 rare so it's unfair to them. "Demand" completely depends on who you trade, some people don't care about warriors and value them at their worth while others love the series and would overpay.
1. Worth about 4.5 09 rares
2. Worth a little under ~6 09 rares
Second trade is worth more, though both are still unfair to the other sides
dogs14780 wrote:dogs14780 wrote:https://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=76110843&userid=915226&signature=S6BIqFdyC5ut86wUOl2wNQ
should i take this? i know theyre under rarity wise but is it about fair demand wise?
???
Nobody is going to be able to give you a real answer "demand wise" as everyone values things differently. This is completely up to you on what you value the bun at and if you're willing to take that much underpay for it or not.
Lopez wrote:Lopez wrote:How fair is
this in the sense of both straight up rarity and demand?
Thanks in advance <3
Your side is worth an early 2010 rare + mid 2010 rare
Their dog is worth a late 09 rare / 2 late 2010 rares, so it's unfair to you a little bit. "Demand" is up to you on what you value the pets at, personally I don't think it really matters here.