demaborkan wrote:
thank you so much everyone! any last opinions?
Rarity wise they need to add roughly another sorb + green tox, as their side only adds up to about a sorbet tier
If you're willing to take that much underpay or not is up to you. If it were me though I wouldn't since the pets on their side aren't the easiest pets to trade off either, and if you're taking that much underpay then personally I would at least get something that can be traded off quicker to make up for it. In the end though, it's your trade and up to you.
If you're willing to take that much underpay or not is up to you. If it were me though I wouldn't since the pets on their side aren't the easiest pets to trade off either, and if you're taking that much underpay then personally I would at least get something that can be traded off quicker to make up for it. In the end though, it's your trade and up to you.
BetasAnimalAJ wrote:http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=72799437&userid=875569&signature=8s3a4gGRonzU5sYvqAYNQg
Hi, is this fair? Any help is highly appreciated, I kinda know it's unfair to me but not sure what to change
It's unfair to them by the uncommon, the 2015 store pet is only worth a late 09 rare, though that uncommon doesn't really make much a difference regardless.
If you feel it's unfair to you "demand wise" and you want them to add more, then that's completely up to you.
If you feel it's unfair to you "demand wise" and you want them to add more, then that's completely up to you.
luckydraw wrote:is this fair? thank you in advance!
http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... Ro9SBZjb1A
Unfair to them by at least a scarf pps rarity wise
"Demand wise" is just up to you if you feel the overpay is worth trading up for or not
"Demand wise" is just up to you if you feel the overpay is worth trading up for or not
