http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... IepMZhD-1Q
Would this be fair for 2 zodiac considering their demand? Thank you in advance!
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)





.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)


.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)





.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
skorch wrote:it's a small trade (nothing rare involved) but could i get some advice? thank you c:
<3
agust wrote:In the first set both trades are over. The second is over by more.Ranger of the North wrote:the second set wrote:How does this look?Rangerthe third wrote:And lastly, are these two pets equal?RangerThanks so much for any help!
In the second set they are also over, your commons do not make up the rare gap.
In the third trade, they are offering a later pet, so they would need to add a common of that year to bridge the gap, i believe.
Gems101 wrote:
I believe the first one is unfair to them, the older uncommons are extra and not needed to make it fair. The second trade I'm not so sure on as I don't know the value of items.. just ask your self if you would be happy to part with them for the rat. Hope I helped
Muse's Epiphany wrote:Hi, is this fair? Thanks.
http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... LRjOZ9sjOw
Muse's Epiphany wrote:Thank you. Can you tell me your reasoning please, so that I can share it with the other person?
Users browsing this forum: boomboxed, Delta Dawn, Dracogryph, Goku-san, nemohappyturtlepants and 1 guest