oʇɐʇoԀ wrote:oʇɐʇoԀ wrote:http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=67190457&userid=814854&signature=a4g6BSPdabf2_weGsnyX3A
They/We edited it. How is it now? What else should be added if it still currently isn't fair?
Another 600C$, or a one non dog.
Unfair to you, the very rare rat would have been just over enough I do believe.
frenchtoastwaffle wrote:Hi I'm relatively new and still trying to get a good grasp on fair trading. Is there a guide for trading pets of different years? For example, I'm not really sure what the early 2010 pet on my end here is worth: http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... WM2vv9_ulg
A 2010 rare is either worth another rare released within 3 months of it's own release, 2 rares from the year after, or 2 uncommons from the year before. So really, the trade you sent wasn't that unfair, if anything you were slightly over.
susurrus wrote:sorry to be back so soon, but is this fair?
http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... -qUS9tYL0Q
Unfair to them, an early 2010 rare is worth 25-30C$, but the zodiacs do have good demand and can easily go for overpay.
CheekyRX wrote:http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=67190908&userid=26641&signature=hE-mwwksZvHrrFCs5oB6-w I've just sent this, do you guys think it's fair
Well.. it's unfair to you rarity wise. Your side is worth 3 nons and a bit, there's is worth 1-2 nons depending on how they value the cerb and marionette. The cerb has been trading for 1-2 nons and the marionette a sorbet, and the zebra has been trading for 1-2 nons.. so I think it's fair demand wise? I'd get another opinion.




















