Eaglespirit wrote:☆αℓρнαƒιяєωⓞℓƒ☆ wrote:Eaglespirit wrote:http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=63649112&userid=850357&signature=mU7OasXybRFnY6CGv7q-TA
how fair is this?
Unfair to you. The top is worth an early 2010 rare. Your side is worth a late 2009 rare. The uncommons don't matter here
So the value of one of my stores is equal to theirs? Or would I have to add something?
No. 2015 store pet=early 2010 rare. 2017 store pet=late 2010 rare. Based on this current trade, they need to add roughly a '09 uncommon/early 2010 uncommon ish.
sandydragon wrote:☆αℓρнαƒιяєωⓞℓƒ☆ wrote:This is unfair to you value wise. Their store pet is worth a mid 2010 rare, so your 2009 rat is overpay. However excluding your 2009 pet, all other pets on your side don't even come close to the value of the store pet or the '12 rare.
Remove the 2012 bat and the store pet on the top
Bottom: keep 4 2016 commons, 2017 common, a 2016 rare
so, am I overpaying, or are they?
I answered that in the first sentence of my reply ^^''
"This is unfair to you value wise."
Demand is up to you and your partner, since not everyone likes rats