CS Rarity List [WIP] - status update on page 75

[Solloby]

Thanks Crestalia c:
Yay lots more pets being counted! <3

Fizzlebee - their numbers are a little low, probably because of their July availability as you say. With that said, I want to be absolutely sure of the data before revealing the final toxic numbers because if they are correct, they change things. All other litters are looking pretty close to what we expected.

Litters
Aug Rat 284 14%
Balloon 394 19%
Galaxy 425 21%
Sorbet 260 13%
Toxic 384 19%
Tribal 286 14%
Total 2033 100%

[EmberzTale]

What do we do if the pet ID is a pet adopted off account?

[Solloby]

Write it down anyway, it doesn't matter if a pet is on or off account ^^

[Fizzlebee]

Thanks Crestalia c:
Yay lots more pets being counted! <3

Fizzlebee - their numbers are a little low, probably because of their July availability as you say. With that said, I want to be absolutely sure of the data before revealing the final toxic numbers because if they are correct, they change things. All other litters are looking pretty close to what we expected.

Litters
Aug Rat 284 14%
Balloon 394 19%
Galaxy 425 21%
Sorbet 260 13%
Toxic 384 19%
Tribal 286 14%
Total 2033 100%

Their makeup of the total pet count is higher than I'd thought it would be. I was worried it was lower, hence the concern over whether they were still a good indication of our samples. With the Toxics still looking unusual I totally agree with you on being cautious.

Sorry for the little sidetrack, I was curious.

[Pelicandreams]

25501-26000

I put both counts on the same spreadsheet. (25501-25750) & (25751-26000)

[Solloby]

^ Thanks!
We've now counted over 4000 pets

Most pets are not changing their ratios with each new batch of data, aside from the sorbets who are still doing all sorts of funky things.

Sorbets
Pink Sorbet 66 22%
Blue Sorbet 63 21%
Yellow Sorbet 89 29%
Green Sorbet 88 29%
Total 306 100%

I found Tess's confirmation that they are equal in rarity: viewtopic.php?f=20&t=146&p=1300#p1300
With that said, while Tess set the adoptions to be equal, random is random; it's possible for the adoption code to spit out more of one outcome than another despite their equal ratios. I'm still not happy with our Sorbet data though.

[.zombie]

Interesting findings! Thank you for your time and your calculations, Solloby, I'd never be able to figure out the math behind these numbers ahaha.

[Pelicandreams]

I'm becoming invested in this!
Plus, I have tomorrow off. I'm set to do some more ranges!
I'll take 27001-27250 & 27251-27500

[EmberzTale]

26001-26250
I found that really fun for some reason
As for the Sorbets, maybe they were intended to be of equal rarity but somehow ended up different.

[harrison ford]

Im so sorry my sheets are coming along so slow, I had to run to another state last minute and forgot to grab my laptop. Im using a family member's, but it is very old and the software is outdated, But I will try to get the links to them in the morning!