Phil Lester wrote:would you personally accept this?
http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... TguCBqWdLg
Phil Lester wrote:would you personally accept this?
http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... TguCBqWdLg
KodiakCentral wrote:
▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁
☆ Jovan
☆ A bi disaster
☆ He/Him
▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁
▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁
—> Instagram <—
—> Art Shop <—
—> Storepet Collection <—
▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁
▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁F
▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁
▁▁▁▁▁▁▁

☆αℓρнαƒιяєωⓞℓƒ☆ wrote:hybridtheory wrote:hybridtheory wrote:Hi, I'm not the best with non-rare pets with older dates- I'd appreciate any help I could get with this ^^
Unfair to you. I value an uncommon as two commons, so their 2011 common cancels out half the worth of your 2011 uncommon. That makes it a 2011 common for a 2015 common, 2016 uncommon, and 3 2017 uncommons. Valuing a rare as four uncommons, a 2011 common is worth a 2014 rare. Their remaining side is worth less than a 2016 rare.






❀
❀
❀

Hi! I'm Osha!
Anime and BTS obsessed
Loves Birbs

}─────
.
.






Phil Lester wrote:Phil Lester wrote:would you personally accept this?
http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... TguCBqWdLg
Inkdragon wrote:Inkdragon wrote:Trade
Demand wise is this fair (is the red x in more demand or the angel advent)
Oshawott8888 wrote:does anyone know if this is fair ^^?
Xylon wrote:Oshawott8888 wrote:does anyone know if this is fair ^^?
I'd say this is quite fair to you. Two tier 1 advents would be around 7/8 09' rares, which is the worth of your tier 7 advent.
I'd get a second opinion on this tho ^^






❀
❀
❀

Hi! I'm Osha!
Anime and BTS obsessed
Loves Birbs

}─────
.
.




Users browsing this forum: Nicnova and 2 guests