☆αℓρнαƒιяєωⓞℓƒ☆ wrote:
Value wise huge overpay on the top. Your side combined is worth one mid/late 2009 rare. Demand is up to you and your partner
thanks, second opinion?
☆αℓρнαƒιяєωⓞℓƒ☆ wrote:
Value wise huge overpay on the top. Your side combined is worth one mid/late 2009 rare. Demand is up to you and your partner




nowafflecone wrote:Hello, is this fair? Thank you in advance
http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... 2K_5bftM7g

TrixiePixie wrote:☆αℓρнαƒιяєωⓞℓƒ☆ wrote:TrixiePixie wrote:I was told this was an unfair trade, but no explanation as to why, so I'm wondering if someone could help me with that so I can make better offers in the future...
http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... -bLQS3hWBQ
It's very unfair to you value wise.
Valuing an uncommon as two commons and a rare as 4 uncommons
Your side is worth two 2015 rares. Their side is worth roughly one 2016 rare
okay, thank you. I was wondering about that, I just have a hard time trying to figure out older pets worth in newer pets.
what could I do to make it more fair? would removing one of the VC 12 pets bring it more to level?
Fwutter wrote:is this trade fair?
nowafflecone wrote:nowafflecone wrote:Hello, is this fair? Thank you in advance
http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... 2K_5bftM7g
Fwutter wrote:musicgurl333 wrote:McBusk wrote:Is this fair to me?
Very unfair to you. The '11 store pet is worth at least an early '09 rare, but you could likely get more for it. The lion on their side is worth about 20C$.
I would say otherwise, all store pets have high demand, but i would say this particular set has the lowest. The lion they are offering his very high demand, also a 2011 store pet is worth an earl '09 rare, i would say the person trading you is overpaying demand wise and rarity wise
Users browsing this forum: Belmoth, Dracogryph, Yandex and 3 guests