Is this fair?
Thanks in advance!
http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... jkuFkl3dcQ
This one too:
http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... heCCG_3tQw






























kody ♛ wrote:Aqurke wrote:Sorry for the wrong link, this is the right one
http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... bgtqQddoJg
wait for a second answer, but
the nick pets original date is 2009 or 2010
i believe so just that alone would be overpay so the rest is overpay.
unless this 2013 pet has some unknown rarity I don't know about hmmmm.. ? XD


james sunderland wrote:Is this fair?
Thanks in advance!
http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... jkuFkl3dcQ

james sunderland wrote:Is this fair?
Thanks in advance!
http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... jkuFkl3dcQ
This one too:
http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... heCCG_3tQw
Fwutter wrote:james sunderland wrote:Is this fair?
Thanks in advance!
http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... jkuFkl3dcQ
I would have to say no this isn't fair, those store pet dears have extremely high demand, originally it would be worth an early '10 rare, but i don't really think this all adds up to even an '11 rare
☆αℓρнαƒιяєωⓞℓƒ☆ wrote:james sunderland wrote:Is this fair?
Thanks in advance!
http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... jkuFkl3dcQ
This one too:
http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... heCCG_3tQw
Unfair to you, a 2015 store pet is worth a mid 2010 rare and their side doesn't add up to that






























Aqurke wrote:kody ♛ wrote:Aqurke wrote:Sorry for the wrong link, this is the right one :)
http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... bgtqQddoJg
wait for a second answer, but
the nick pets original date is 2009 or 2010
i believe so just that alone would be overpay so the rest is overpay.
unless this 2013 pet has some unknown rarity I don't know about hmmmm.. ? XD
Sorry, could you explain that again? I don't understand, there are no 2008 or 2010s?
☆αℓρнαƒιяєωⓞℓƒ☆ wrote:TrixiePixie wrote:I was told this was an unfair trade, but no explanation as to why, so I'm wondering if someone could help me with that so I can make better offers in the future...
http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... -bLQS3hWBQ
It's very unfair to you value wise.
Valuing an uncommon as two commons and a rare as 4 uncommons
Your side is worth two 2015 rares. Their side is worth roughly one 2016 rare
Users browsing this forum: Belmoth, Dracogryph, Yandex and 3 guests