The "Is this a fair trade?" thread

[Vega•]

Sorry for the wrong link, this is the right one

http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... bgtqQddoJg

[Fwutter]

Is this fair to me?

Very unfair to you. The '11 store pet is worth at least an early '09 rare, but you could likely get more for it. The lion on their side is worth about 20C$.

I would say otherwise, all store pets have high demand, but i would say this particular set has the lowest. The lion they are offering his very high demand, also a 2011 store pet is worth an earl '09 rare, i would say the person trading you is overpaying demand wise and rarity wise

[Bernese]

Sorry for the wrong link, this is the right one

http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... bgtqQddoJg

extreme overpay on their side as the nick dog let alone is from 2009 and has a high demand.

[kököchin]

Sorry for the wrong link, this is the right one

http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... bgtqQddoJg

The nick dog/mouse alone is overpay. It is a re-release from 2009 ♥

[Eagle's Eye]

I was told this was an unfair trade, but no explanation as to why, so I'm wondering if someone could help me with that so I can make better offers in the future...

http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... -bLQS3hWBQ

It's very unfair to you value wise.
Valuing an uncommon as two commons and a rare as 4 uncommons
Your side is worth two 2015 rares. Their side is worth roughly one 2016 rare

[calculator]

Sorry for the wrong link, this is the right one

http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... bgtqQddoJg

wait for a second answer, but
the nick pets original date is 2009 or 2010
i believe so just that alone would be overpay so the rest is overpay.
unless this 2013 pet has some unknown rarity I don't know about hmmmm.. ? XD

[Vega•]

I was told this was an unfair trade, but no explanation as to why, so I'm wondering if someone could help me with that so I can make better offers in the future...

http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... -bLQS3hWBQ

This is unfair because the pets they want from you were both made 5 years ago, they were willing to give you a number of 2017 pets that don't match up to your pet's dates

sorry, I do not understand what you are trying to say? was it unfair to them? or to me? And I sent the trade, not them. They said it was unfair and that I could try again, but I'm not sure how to proceed because I don't know what made it unfair.

Sorry, I meant the pets you want from them were all 2017, but maybe they thought they needed more for it? Inexperienced trading made them think they deserved more :l it was a pretty fair trade actually now I look a ton it again. Sorry for being confusing lol

[far]

Is THIS fair demand wise?

[pink]

Is THIS fair demand wise?

To me it's not.

[TrixiePixie]

I was told this was an unfair trade, but no explanation as to why, so I'm wondering if someone could help me with that so I can make better offers in the future...

http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... -bLQS3hWBQ

It's very unfair to you value wise.
Valuing an uncommon as two commons and a rare as 4 uncommons
Your side is worth two 2015 rares. Their side is worth roughly one 2016 rare

okay, thank you. I was wondering about that, I just have a hard time trying to figure out older pets worth in newer pets.

what could I do to make it more fair? would removing one of the VC 12 pets bring it more to level?