The "Is this a fair trade?" thread

[Kitty Cheshire]

Fair? I'm a bit iffy when it comes to store pets demand and rarity.

[piggie]

when i've had nons, i haven't really had trouble trading it away either for trade ups or downs c:

Okay, but how easy is the non coon to trade away? I'm not so great with lists, apologies.

ive had each of the nons before and all of them are easy to trade away,
but i'd say the non coon was a little harder to trade away than the others,
but easier than the non tag. i do agree, though, that you shouldn't take
the offer above. hope this helps! :] have a wonderful day and good luck!

I shouldn't take the offer? I thought pigeon was saying it was unfair to the non? Sorry, I'm confused.

Thank you both so much tho! c:

[n o k i a.]

Fair? I'm a bit iffy when it comes to store pets demand and rarity.

im not sure about the demand of the store pet, but a 2016 store pet
is worth a late 2010 and a 2015 store pet is worth a mid 2010 rare, which is equal to
a late/mid 09 rare. the store pet on their side is worth a late 09 rare, so i'd say it's
pretty fair. hope this helps! :] have a wonderful day!

[n o k i a.]

I shouldn't take the offer? I thought pigeon was saying it was unfair to the non? Sorry, I'm confused.

Thank you both so much tho! c:

my bad, my mind is scrambled at the moment as i just woke up a little
while ago, but yes you should take the offer. its a very nice overpay as
long as you don't mind trading off quantity. sorry for the confusion! :]

[piggie]

I shouldn't take the offer? I thought pigeon was saying it was unfair to the non? Sorry, I'm confused.

Thank you both so much tho! c:

my bad, my mind is scrambled at the moment as i just woke up a little
while ago, but yes you should take the offer. its a very nice overpay as
long as you don't mind trading off quantity. sorry for the confusion! :]

lol, it's totally cool. Thanks for your help.

[Kitty Cheshire]

Fair? I'm a bit iffy when it comes to store pets demand and rarity.

im not sure about the demand of the store pet, but a 2016 store pet
is worth a late 2010 and a 2015 store pet is worth a mid 2010 rare, which is equal to
a late/mid 09 rare. the store pet on their side is worth a late 09 rare, so i'd say it's
pretty fair. hope this helps! :] have a wonderful day!

Thank you very much ;) second opinion please?

[Eagle's Eye]

Fair? I'm a bit iffy when it comes to store pets demand and rarity.

im not sure about the demand of the store pet, but a 2016 store pet
is worth a late 2010 and a 2015 store pet is worth a mid 2010 rare, which is equal to
a late/mid 09 rare. the store pet on their side is worth a late 09 rare, so i'd say it's
pretty fair. hope this helps! :] have a wonderful day!

Thank you very much ;) second opinion please?

I agree with the value wise part
Demand wise, older store pets are more likely to go for more since they're harder to find

[regulus black]

I have a few offers for my older store pets. I would love to know if you would personally accept them, and why (or why not) c: I'm fairly sure how fair they are, just curious about a few opinions <3

trade 1

trade 2

edit: and another one

[pigeon -]

can i get help on this trade? c:

I would say they are overpaying but I would get a second opinion <3

I believe they are overpaying by several uncommons.

I'm not sure that I agree. One of your uncommons is a '10 rerelease. It looks unfair to you, though I'm unsure by how much.

thank you! can i get a few more opinions, and what would need changing? c:

[regulus black]

can i get help on this trade? c:

I would say they are overpaying but I would get a second opinion <3

I believe they are overpaying by several uncommons.

I'm not sure that I agree. One of your uncommons is a '10 rerelease. It looks unfair to you, though I'm unsure by how much.

thank you! can i get a few more opinions, and what would need changing? c:

just want to jump in here with a statement: strictly speaking, one 2010 uncommon needs eight 2012 commons for it to be fair, so their side does not add up to both of those 2010 uncommons I believe c: