Jiloon wrote:lucifer morningstar wrote:can I get a second opinion on this? I thought rares went for an uncommon 2-3 years older? What year of uncommon would be fair for a '16 rare? Any help would be appreciated. c:First off, cats are not valued much unless they're rare+ or sitting cats. Also, it's usually uncommons that are more like 3-4 years older, and usually uncommons with good demand for rares with little demand. This was very unfair to the other side. Even one rare for the cat would be a bad trade for the person with the rare.
lucifer morningstar wrote:Jiloon wrote:lucifer morningstar wrote:can I get a second opinion on this? I thought rares went for an uncommon 2-3 years older? What year of uncommon would be fair for a '16 rare? Any help would be appreciated. c:First off, cats are not valued much unless they're rare+ or sitting cats. Also, it's usually uncommons that are more like 3-4 years older, and usually uncommons with good demand for rares with little demand. This was very unfair to the other side. Even one rare for the cat would be a bad trade for the person with the rare.Thanks for your input. Could I get one more opinion?
Jessica. wrote:Jessica. wrote:

popo124 wrote: http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... Wug13vZkMg
Is this fair?


Polarblaze wrote:http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=56225562&userid=778256&signature=jMzkz5rzQkSiZakUYo1i6g
please help ❤️
Users browsing this forum: Chelsearice123, faedemon, Rem. and 1 guest