So is this fair?
http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... ckgnabzelw
LemonadeQueen wrote:
Rarity wise it is unfair to them, a 2014 very rare is worth a 2010 rare. Demand wise, I am not sure. I would get a second opinion.

LemonadeQueen wrote:
Rarity wise it is unfair to them, a 2014 very rare is worth a 2010 rare. Demand wise, I am not sure. I would get a second opinion.

LemonadeQueen wrote:
Rarity wise it is unfair to them, a 2014 very rare is worth a 2010 rare. Demand wise, I am not sure. I would get a second opinion.
Current Goals wrote:
▪ own one of each store pet, incl. list ▪
▪ own one of each pet uncommon & below ▪
▪ own one of each rare pet from 2011 to present ▪
Credits wrote:All artwork use as avvie/siggy has been purchased for my exclusive use! Characters are owned by me.
Takk wrote:WitchyPurplePanda wrote:Zombilon wrote:They are from the same year, but... Two uncommons don't equal a rare. Plus rats have very bad demand right now.
I wouldn't accept.
Thank you very much! Is there any other opinions?
Usually 4 uncommons make a rare, unfair you
Alphys~ wrote:
I would accept it, but that's just me.

Zombilon wrote:Zombilon wrote:Should I accept this?
I haven't gotten any great offers on my warrior in a couple of days, so I'm tempted lol
Edit: I can probably get them to swap the '09 pony for an '09 dog if that would be better.
Should I ask them to add another '14 rare or two as well? Or is that too much? I've just been told on here I can get a couple of '09 rares for him, so I'm hesitant.
Current Goals wrote:
▪ own one of each store pet, incl. list ▪
▪ own one of each pet uncommon & below ▪
▪ own one of each rare pet from 2011 to present ▪
Credits wrote:All artwork use as avvie/siggy has been purchased for my exclusive use! Characters are owned by me.
Users browsing this forum: Dracogryph and 2 guests