lock

My gallery · by **Togami Byakuya** » Thu Jun 16, 2016 11:18 am

http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... t4x8HW0gGg
hElp??

My gallery · by **.rin okumura.** » Thu Jun 16, 2016 11:19 am

Red Toxic + ? = Purple Toxic

My gallery · by **Aztrima** » Thu Jun 16, 2016 11:19 am

http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=53917491&userid=794624&signature=b7K8f9MOMPoJTY73iXkgMQ
I feel they might be overing but I'm not sure can anyone help me out here? Thank you.

Wrong trade sorry

My gallery · by **CoyoteScribz** » Thu Jun 16, 2016 11:22 am

http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... mmR41zYUnA

Is this fair?? o3o

My gallery · by **dogcatalog** » Thu Jun 16, 2016 11:23 am

Baemastatic wrote:http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=53917518&userid=775728&signature=O_-nFb2BfEc_t4x8HW0gGg
hElp??

if your asking if it was fair, it wasnt. you offered one of your VRs for seceral of their VRs, its like asking for 7 apples for 1 apple

My gallery · by **~ t r o u b l e ~** » Thu Jun 16, 2016 11:28 am

curlew curfew wrote:
Baemastatic wrote:http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=53917518&userid=775728&signature=O_-nFb2BfEc_t4x8HW0gGg
hElp??

if your asking if it was fair, it wasnt. you offered one of your VRs for seceral of their VRs, its like asking for 7 apples for 1 apple

it was unfair to them, but not because it was multiple very rares for one very rare.
The bun is worth around 6-7 mid 09 rares, their side is worth roughly 9-10. Just the 2012-2013 store pets would be fair by rarity, though their pets likely have much better demand than your bun ^^

My gallery · by **Aztrima** » Thu Jun 16, 2016 11:31 am

http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... TY73iXkgMQ
Help???

My gallery · by **MsCanadian** » Thu Jun 16, 2016 11:33 am

CoyoteScribz wrote:http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=53906228&userid=795982&signature=cQcs-bmTPW8FmmR41zYUnA

Would this be fair?

I would say fair because 2 recent store pets would make up a 2009 rare, so four of those store pets would make up for two of those dogs. then two of the foxes make up for a 2010 rare, therefore its fair to make up for the last god cuz its equal to 2 2009 rares, which makes up for the 2009 rare.

I'm sorry if this is kinda confusing .-.

My gallery · by **.rin okumura.** » Thu Jun 16, 2016 11:35 am

Red Toxic + ? = Purple Toxic

My gallery · by **~ t r o u b l e ~** » Thu Jun 16, 2016 11:36 am

CoyoteScribz wrote:http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=53906228&userid=795982&signature=cQcs-bmTPW8FmmR41zYUnA

Would this be fair?

looks a tad unfair to them by rarity. The store pets cover two of their dogs but the foxes don't quite cover another late 09 rare. Is not too far off by rarity, I would say a couple more 2010 uncommons would make up the gap
However, store pets do tend to have rather good demand ^^

♡ Musicals ♡ wrote:
Red Toxic + ? = Purple Toxic

roughly a gearback

lock

Re: The "Is This a Fair Trade?" Thread

Re: The "Is This a Fair Trade?" Thread

Re: The "Is This a Fair Trade?" Thread

Re: The "Is This a Fair Trade?" Thread

Re: The "Is This a Fair Trade?" Thread

Re: The "Is This a Fair Trade?" Thread

Re: The "Is This a Fair Trade?" Thread

Re: The "Is This a Fair Trade?" Thread

Re: The "Is This a Fair Trade?" Thread

Re: The "Is This a Fair Trade?" Thread

Who is online