Falling_Rain wrote:is this fair, demand and rarity wise?thanks for the help guys! more opinions?
edit: I edited my trade! now is it fair?!?!?
Falling_Rain wrote:is this fair, demand and rarity wise?thanks for the help guys! more opinions?




Castiel Winchester wrote:Castiel Winchester wrote:Castiel Winchester wrote:Could anybody help me with this?
If you wouldn't mind, could you explain who it is unfair to, your math behind it, and how to fix it?


Agnès wrote:-snip-
not sure.. other suggestions?
Cavy's Girl wrote:http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=39329163&userid=19680&signature=4XywbbFqXutxq25ziUbrYA
Is this fair? Keep in consideration that I don't need the foxes at all for my wishlist so they are alittle lower, if not just fodder for better pets...
Falling_Rain wrote:Falling_Rain wrote:is this fair, demand and rarity wise?thanks for the help guys! more opions?



fang0fang wrote:KyoshiYan wrote:meow
http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... 1ZUNnHb4Qg
What can I remove for it to be fair on my side since I am overpaying?
I think you should remove the store dog. The 2010 dog itself is very high in demand. Maybe add some more uncommon to your side after removing the two store pets.
pie54155 wrote:http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=39329505&userid=649818&signature=ts1CHrw3uOwXKv9Sb5_vEw
This is what they have that I want wrote:=Rare,
=Rare,
=Very Rare,
=Very Rare,
=Very Rare
They are currently offering these 2 pets:=Very Rare,
=Rare
<-Both are true date 2009.They want these 2 pets from me wrote:,

















