Manikarnika wrote:Manikarnika wrote:Is this fair?
http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=39188603&userid=393277&signature=5xjQvApp87Ts_-srEa5kig
Warning. Large trade. Their 77 pets for my Dark Leopard?
DL worth ~ 40 2009 Rares
12-18 pets - 2008 green butterfly wolf, 2009 ladybug bw, 2009 spider, 2010 dog
Opinion 1 - Unfair to DL
Can I get an opinion with what can be added to make it fair?
1 2008 (2008 green butterfly wolf)
15 2009 rares + 1 + 1 (2009 ladybug bw, 2009 spider) = 17
2 2009 uncommon
14 2010 rares
30 2010 uncommon + 1 (2010 dog)
5 2011 rares
2 2011 uncommon
Even if we value 2 uncommons = 1 rare (which is a pretty eh method, as far as I'm concerned), it'd still work out something like this:
Base 17 2009 rares.
2008 rare = 2 2009 rares
2 2009 uncommons = 1 rare
14 2010 rares = 7 2009 rares
30 2010 uncommons = 15 2010 rares = 7.5 2009 rares
5 2011 rares = 2.5 2010 rares = 1.something 2009 rare (this is ridiculous, I admit)
2 2011 uncommons = ????? (I don't think they even weight much if anything at all for this trade)
Either way, all added up we'd get something like 17 + 2 + 7.5 + 7 + 1 = 35 or whereabouts
Which is not 40. But it's difficult to figure out how much the pets are worth, especially in such a quantity and with such different tades (imo it'd be very hard to trade those 15 2010 rares for 7 2009 rares, so it's kinda a moot point in those conversions).
Demand wise, it seems to fare even worse. The trade has a bunch of low demand pets (rats, spiders, etc.) and only a handful of dogs.
I stay by what I said earlier and say it's unfair, both with or without demand. As for what should be added? If you don't care about demand, then at least another 5 2009 rares.
But anyone, feel free to contradict me.
[/url]
