*Cleolei AdryaN* wrote:NocturnalPanda wrote:http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php? id=38937148&userid=27857&signature=2-mnaYCJewhClmzFRVQ_9A Is this fair? What should be added/removed/changed on the other persons side to make it fair? Thank you!
Unfair to them, as the both rares would be fine for the Sheperd (they are early '09 rares)
Do you mean both as in both of them together, or either one? Because one is the same month as the shepherd, one is 2 months older and both are still rare, whereas the shepherd is vr. So rarity wise I was thinking it should be about fair, but then the shepherd is quite in demand, which boosts the rarity.I wanted to check that my perception of the rarity is correct as I can sometimes be a bit out. And I am never good at bridging gaps. So if it isn't fair, I have no idea how much by. Or I could be horribly wrong?
*Cleolei AdryaN* wrote:*kätzchen* wrote:http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=38937362&userid=285283&signature=g4QZPixc2KhJjTg4NjdTOQ
Is this here fair? I'm really not sure...
Unfair to you as '11 common = '13 uncommon
I'd say they're overpaying by quite a bit. With those two commons you could probably get at least an uncommon 11' advent pet. Get a second opinion though.