chubbi corgi wrote:http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=37042923&userid=641070&signature=rkuFQWclPFjG1-K3S2cCvA
Fair?
A bit unfair to your pink September, even though the Septembers have bad demand.
chubbi corgi wrote:http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=37042923&userid=641070&signature=rkuFQWclPFjG1-K3S2cCvA
Fair?

















Lana wrote:Would this trade be fair? Thank you very much! Demand wise too? If you could also tell muah what I could get traded for the dog they're offering? :0
chubbi corgi wrote:http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=37042923&userid=641070&signature=rkuFQWclPFjG1-K3S2cCvA
Fair?

Catfight wrote:Lana wrote:Would this trade be fair? Thank you very much! Demand wise too? If you could also tell muah what I could get traded for the dog they're offering? :0
Unfair to the other person rarity wise, unfair to you demand wise C:
DuckGoesRawr wrote:Catfight wrote:Lana wrote:Would this trade be fair? Thank you very much! Demand wise too? If you could also tell muah what I could get traded for the dog they're offering? :0
Unfair to the other person rarity wise, unfair to you demand wise C:You realise that the lists already factor demand right? It's unfair to me both ways, it just depends on how they value their pet compared to mine.




Beautiful Nightmare wrote:
Unfair to you I believe
Users browsing this forum: Applebot [Spider], musicgurl333 and 0 guests