Ciel. wrote:Lady Sif wrote:Ciel. wrote:So, using the C$ worth guide, here is what I got:
Blue Rose: 260-280
P B-wolf: 65
2009-10: 25-30
2010-10: 15
2010x6: 90 (because store pets are value at '10 rare)
The range for these ten pets is 455-480, and is isn't even count the rereleased horses. So it's unfair to the pet side. ^^
That's not how C$ works. You add up the pets' value and then convert the highest possible pet you could get into C$
For example, two Candy Cane Horses don't equal a red dragon.
The trade is unfair to the C$, because 450 C$ is enough to get a Light Speckled Rat.
★ But they're not asking for the highest possible value. They're asking for the worth of eah pet. That's why I told them and then totaled it. If they wanted to know the highest possible list pet for their C$, they would've asked that.
The way you find the C$ value of a group of pets, is you total the pets' value and then convert that value into C$.
Look at it this way:
Blue Rose = 7 Mid-advents
Mid-advent = 75 C$
7 * 75 = 525 C$
But wait, a blue rose is only worth 260-280 C$ according to the guide.
Pet values and C$ values work differently, because C$ is bought with real money. That's the way it has to work in order to be reasonable.
If we didn't do it that way, a UR tiger/sunjewel would be worth almost 5,000 USD. Way more than anyone would ever pay.
Don't believe me? Take a look:
Staring from mid-advent tier:
Blue Rose = 7 Mid-advents
Balloon Dog = 3 Blue Roses
Yellow Toxic = 2 Balloon Dogs
Sorbet = 2 Yellow Toxics
Non-dog = 3 Sorbets
UR Tiger = 5 Nons
75*7*3*2*2*3*5 = 94,500 C$/19 (The lowest price you can get C$ for)=
4,973.68....
Which would be a ridiculous amount to spend on pixels.
That's why you can't add up C$ prices, you have to add up pet prices and then convert.
Also, they weren't asking for the C$ values of all the pets. They were asking if the trade was fair.
