RubyTheDrawer wrote:http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=33085422&userid=591873&signature=LmeZ1caARDtRECzj37WMkA
is this fair?
I'd say unfair to bottom because the amount of pets given aren't enough for the list pet.
RubyTheDrawer wrote:http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=33085422&userid=591873&signature=LmeZ1caARDtRECzj37WMkA
is this fair?

Niall Horan. wrote:*♚Your Princess♚* wrote:
Would you think this is fair?
http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... ZKqbmrkdlQ
Unfair to the bottom, people are over-valuing the new URs.



Dragon Documentary wrote:Niall Horan. wrote:*♚Your Princess♚* wrote:
Would you think this is fair?
http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... ZKqbmrkdlQ
Unfair to the bottom, people are over-valuing the new URs.
Please don't give out advice on new UR trades, because we don't know what they will be worth, so we can't help you with new UR trades c:



Twister in Rage wrote:




Dragon Documentary wrote:I know c: I didn't say it was a rule, but I'm just saying that we can't give accurate advice on new UR trades because we don't know where they will be placed on the list until demand dies down u v u



.png)











.png)







Users browsing this forum: heartfades, Juliamon, lilactea, Sakkiel and 2 guests