'Possum wrote:
--snip--~Radioactive~ wrote:
I think it's a little unfair for the Grinner.
So what can be added?
'Possum wrote:
--snip--~Radioactive~ wrote:
I think it's a little unfair for the Grinner.




















~ApprenticeOfNyx~ wrote:Thanks for the help on the last trade, everyone! c:
Can someone tell me how I can make this trade fairer to them? According to the $C - Pet thread, their pet is worth about 15+ C$. I added in the pets too, which are all on their wishlist, because their pet has such high demand, even though it's in a trade group.
But. I still don't think it's fairWhat else should I add? I have rares, but none were on their wishlist. What else would be suitable, rarity, demand, and date-wise?
Thanks!
Gwenfoxe wrote:
Unfair to them.
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)


.png)
.png)
.png)



.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)













'Possum wrote:
--snip--~Radioactive~ wrote:
I think it's a little unfair for the Grinner.
'Possum wrote:Gwenfoxe wrote:
Unfair to them.
How so? The Store cat was only available if you bought the whole set for 60CS$.
There are a lot of people who consider it worth that much because you had to pay that in order to get it. Sort of a special release store pet.
Even if you don't consider that, a current store pet costs 20CS$ to purchase. Once they're retired their value in CS$ goes up over time.
For these reasons that cat alone is definitely worth at least 20CS$ The other pets on top of that are just extra and make it even more unfair for the store cat side.
'Possum wrote:Gwenfoxe wrote:
Unfair to them.
How so? The Store cat was only available if you bought the whole set for 60CS$.
There are a lot of people who consider it worth that much because you had to pay that in order to get it. Sort of a special release store pet.
Even if you don't consider that, a current store pet costs 20CS$ to purchase. Once they're retired their value in CS$ goes up over time.
For these reasons that cat alone is definitely worth at least 20CS$ The other pets on top of that are just extra and make it even more unfair for the store cat side.
Yoyce wrote:That's exactly what Gwenfoxe wrote, unfair to them -> unfair to the Cat side, right?
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)


.png)
.png)
.png)



.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)













Yoyce wrote:That's exactly what Gwenfoxe wrote, unfair to them -> unfair to the Cat side, right?
Tweety* wrote:Tweety* wrote:Thanks for all the help. Could you please help make this fair?

Users browsing this forum: CarpetShark, livviecakes, nyctophilia, Reiemye and 0 guests