azalea wrote:
??
Is it a way underoffer for the three 08s? What should be added so it's fairer? >,<
I'd say fair, but get a second opinion. I've never really understood much about rarities.
azalea wrote:
??
Is it a way underoffer for the three 08s? What should be added so it's fairer? >,<





:Akita: wrote:azalea wrote:
??
Is it a way underoffer for the three 08s? What should be added so it's fairer? >,<
I'd say fair, but get a second opinion. I've never really understood much about rarities.
SagittariusII wrote:♥Ɖakota♥ wrote:
for the new store dog set?
Fair.
LightBlueAqua wrote:LightBlueAqua wrote:LightBlueAqua wrote:one of the new store dogs for an early 09 uncommon dog OR early 09 rare rat?

azalea wrote:
??
Is it a way underoffer for the three 08s? What should be added so it's fairer? >,<
SagittariusII wrote:My question:
Valentine's 09 lion + March 09 gray shepherd dog + 6 dog newborns + 2 bwolf newborns
for
Oct.08 blue moon dog?
SagittariusII wrote:SagittariusII wrote:My question:
Valentine's 09 lion + March 09 gray shepherd dog + 6 dog newborns + 2 bwolf newborns
for
Oct.08 blue moon dog?
Can anybody answer? I've been bumping this up since last night.Thank you.




Raquella wrote:Hello! =) I was wondering if anyone else thought this trade was a little unfair. I just wanted to get some opinions before making a decision. Thanks!
They offered:
Rarity: Unknown
They asked for:
Rarity: Uncommon ; Rarity: Common
I was just offered these six pets:![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
For this ONE unrated August 2010:
This pet can't possibly actually be worth that much, can it?! Is there something about it that I'm not aware of? Is there a guide somewhere that's listed it as Very Rare without my knowledge? Granted, I'm not complaining - one '10 Uncommon and five '09 Uncommons is fantastic - but unless the person's just really attached to this outcome, I can't imagine why they'd offer this high! Any thoughts?
~Kalista
Users browsing this forum: faedemon, Google Adsense [Bot], Nicnova, Rem. and 1 guest