The "Is This a Fair Trade?" Thread

[BeaztVibe]

Would this be a fair trade for my Store Pets? Since their dog is 2009, its thrown me off a bit. Help is much appreciated c: Thank you

Sort've fair , maby unfair to the bottom. Get second advice though, these store pets are confuzzling.

Agreed. My post is at the bottom. Exception:
If you are looking for warrior cats and willing to overpay. In that case, this trade is fair.

Please dont give false advice its unfair to the top. The store pets on the bottom are only worth a 2010 mid-late rare each

[tawnypelt3]

http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=29900034&userid=56647&signature=KG1I0B1ds5LZeaxQkXktrw
Is this fair? c:

Extremely, extremely unfair to them. I don't know how many Advents and 2009 rares a Main List pet is worth, but it's somewhere in the range of 100000 to . ._.

http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=29890094&userid=52903&signature=dczDMRtlHCe30hKYzOesbg

Also, how is this for fairness?
http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... 3GyA1cViog

Please remember to be patient. Many people who give advice on CS are in the Western hemisphere, and it's nighttime in the US right now, so not a lot of people are on. Besides that, not everyone will know whether your trade is fair.

The first is unfair to you. Second is also unfair to you.

Would this be a fair trade for my Store Pets? Since their dog is 2009, its thrown me off a bit. Help is much appreciated c: Thank you

Please dont give false advice its unfair to the top. The store pets on the bottom are only worth a 2010 mid-late rare each

But those three store pets are all together worth 60 C$. The 2009 rare and 2010 rare are not worth 60 C$ together. 60 C$ is a good Advent List pet, you know. I realize that they're "just store pets," but you can't reduce their worth in real money just because they're recent VRs.

[melonie]

http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... CFxP1MD0KQ
is this fair

Lol. Wrong link.

[~Teeny~]

ahahah whoops!!! How about now? thoughts please ?:)

http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... CFxP1MD0KQ

[melonie]

http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... m6bRdm_Dzg

[BeaztVibe]

Would this be a fair trade for my Store Pets? Since their dog is 2009, its thrown me off a bit. Help is much appreciated c: Thank you

Please dont give false advice its unfair to the top. The store pets on the bottom are only worth a 2010 mid-late rare each

But those three store pets are all together worth 60 C$. The 2009 rare and 2010 rare are not worth 60 C$ together. 60 C$ is a good Advent List pet, you know. I realize that they're "just store pets," but you can't reduce their worth in real money just because they're recent VRs.

everyone even official People say They are worth 2010 mid-late rares. So there is a problem with C$ when it comes to things like that. Because 2 09 rares can be up to about 70C$ but that doesn't mean 2 of them make a Midadvent

[Nikki Amaranti]

Would this be a fair trade for my Store Pets? Since their dog is 2009, its thrown me off a bit. Help is much appreciated c: Thank you

A late 09 rare/very rare ranging from September to December is worth between 25-30C$

An early 2010 rare/very rare ranging from January to April is worth around 25C$
A mid 2010 rare/very rare ranging from May to August is worth around 20C$ (Current store pet worth)

A store pet from current month is worth 20C$!
A store pet from before the current month is worth a little more then this! think 23-25C$!
As store pets get older, their worth rises but it rises slowly!

If we're going by C$ and following the above info; their side would be worth around 75C$ - 80C$.
The side with the current store pets would be worth around 83C$ - 85C$ (alpaca: 23-25C$, current store dogs: 20C$ each).

So it'll be unfair to you by C$-wise, definitely.
It's not unfair by a whole lot, but still unfair if you want to know. ^ ^

[Ciarla]

Would this be a fair trade for my Store Pets? Since their dog is 2009, its thrown me off a bit. Help is much appreciated c: Thank you

Sort've fair , maby unfair to the bottom. Get second advice though, these store pets are confuzzling.

According to my pets brain maths, the 2010 rare will cover one of your store pet. Then the other 2013 pet will cover your llamas, and the 2009 rare worth a 2012 store pet, and a 2 x 2013 store pet is very unfair for a 2012 store pet, which means I think that this trade is unfair to you. I am quite new, so please get a second opinion.

Agreed. My post is at the bottom. Exception:
If you are looking for warrior cats and willing to overpay. In that case, this trade is fair.

Please dont give false advice its unfair to the top. The store pets on the bottom are only worth a 2010 mid-late rare each

But those three store pets are all together worth 60 C$. The 2009 rare and 2010 rare are not worth 60 C$ together. 60 C$ is a good Advent List pet, you know. I realize that they're "just store pets," but you can't reduce their worth in real money just because they're recent VRs.

everyone even official People say They are worth 2010 mid-late rares. So there is a problem with C$ when it comes to things like that. Because 2 09 rares can be up to about 70C$ but that doesn't mean 2 of them make a Midadvent

Getting a little confused now.
So C$ wise - A little unfair to me?
Rarity Wise - A bit unfair to them?

So either way, its not unfair by a lot right?

[BeaztVibe]

Getting a little confused now.
So C$ wise - A little unfair to me?
Rarity Wise - A bit unfair to them?

So either way, its not unfair by a lot right?

When it comes to C$/Store pet worth, different people have different views. Most are all for pet rarities, while others like some of the ones favoring C$ are for C$ values. It really just depends on where you stand to see what you want. I am for pet rarity because C$ honestly makes no sense so i don't really want it. But its up to you

[~Teeny~]

http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... CFxP1MD0KQ

Guys! can i please get some help or adivce?