infinityforever wrote:I have to disagree with you on that @~Cake Pops~. The first bid is an overpay, and the third isn't even fair to the grinner.
Well actually it is overpay. Just not as big an overpay as the first.
infinityforever wrote:I have to disagree with you on that @~Cake Pops~. The first bid is an overpay, and the third isn't even fair to the grinner.
C.S. Lewis wrote:You can never get a cup of tea large enough, or a book long enough to suit me.
Umbrellas wrote:DarkStar~ wrote:deand wise , got offer for a BA for my p - toxic. demand wise fair?
I've gotten purple toxic level pets offered for my BA before, but you can get one for less. It's a bit of a stretch, imo. I wouldn't take it personally; I'd add a bit to their side.



Umbrellas wrote:
Unfair to them
Unfair to you (unless one of those items is worth a lot)



Alpha Bet wrote:Thanks guys. x3
Any other opinions?
I thought that the first one might be better, since the Purple Grinner is technically rarer than the Blue since I believe it turned rare first, (I could be wrong on that), but I didn't know if all of the other rares in the other bid PLUS the low advent list pet would bring that up to the Grinner's worth?
C.S. Lewis wrote:You can never get a cup of tea large enough, or a book long enough to suit me.
CelestialFlame wrote:Umbrellas wrote:
Unfair to them
Unfair to you (unless one of those items is worth a lot)
Thanks.
How is it unfair though? Just wondering. :3
http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... 3ht0Rlde_w
C.S. Lewis wrote:You can never get a cup of tea large enough, or a book long enough to suit me.
heartsong wrote:heartsong wrote:Is this trade fair? http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=24008298&userid=20172&signature=5e-A1oEdFCLkMf0OL4bfaA
I'm not the best with items and most of the stuff on the item guide is valued at the whole set rather than individual items
Thanks in advance


Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest