Apple wrote:wait what
I cried.

DaisyTheory wrote:.:BuddyMaltese:. wrote:So I sent this trade.
It's not the fact that they cancelled that irritates me - no one is really obligated to accept a trade.
It's their cancel message that bring me to this thread.The dates may be right but you still know this is unfair to me.
(That part wasn't really bolded and underlined. I'm just emphasizing the part I'm ranting about).
... Now I'm not sure why they implied that I had sent a trade that I knew was unfair to them.
In my eyes, it seemed pretty fair. I send out species swap trades all the time and I understand why people cancel most of them. They just don't want horses for their dogs. That's completely understandable but I still continue to send species swap trades because there are a few people out there that do accept them. That trade seemed fair rarity wise.
Now if this trade IS unfair rarity wise: Please note that I didn't know.
I'll also give them the benefit of the doubt and say they might have meant to imply something else in their cancel message.
I apologize if I blew this out of proportion. For some reason that just really got to me.That's unfair??
To-Do wrote:(storing elsewhere)



Kyar wrote:DaisyTheory wrote:.:BuddyMaltese:. wrote:So I sent this trade.
It's not the fact that they cancelled that irritates me - no one is really obligated to accept a trade.
It's their cancel message that bring me to this thread.
The dates may be right but you still know this is unfair to me.
(That part wasn't really bolded and underlined. I'm just emphasizing the part I'm ranting about).
... Now I'm not sure why they implied that I had sent a trade that I knew was unfair to them.
In my eyes, it seemed pretty fair. I send out species swap trades all the time and I understand why people cancel most of them. They just don't want horses for their dogs. That's completely understandable but I still continue to send species swap trades because there are a few people out there that do accept them. That trade seemed fair rarity wise.
Now if this trade IS unfair rarity wise: Please note that I didn't know.
I'll also give them the benefit of the doubt and say they might have meant to imply something else in their cancel message.
I apologize if I blew this out of proportion. For some reason that just really got to me.That's unfair??
It's totally fair. Some people are just weird about demand.


.:BuddyMaltese:. wrote:So I sent this trade.
It's not the fact that they cancelled that irritates me - no one is really obligated to accept a trade.
It's their cancel message that bring me to this thread.The dates may be right but you still know this is unfair to me.
(That part wasn't really bolded and underlined. I'm just emphasizing the part I'm ranting about).
... Now I'm not sure why they implied that I had sent a trade that I knew was unfair to them.
In my eyes, it seemed pretty fair. I send out species swap trades all the time and I understand why people cancel most of them. They just don't want horses for their dogs. That's completely understandable but I still continue to send species swap trades because there are a few people out there that do accept them. That trade seemed fair rarity wise.
Now if this trade IS unfair rarity wise: Please note that I didn't know.
I'll also give them the benefit of the doubt and say they might have meant to imply something else in their cancel message.
I apologize if I blew this out of proportion. For some reason that just really got to me.
le trader wrote:you can make your screen bigger so you can read it do you have a computer or tablet
Currently wrote:I have a Non-Swirl Dog UFA.

Pieces of Writing wrote:My Sonnets
Symphonic wrote:the anticipation in waiting to see if a trade you sent will be accepted or cancelled D:
especially when it's for something you're reallyreally wanting.
kills me every time.
Users browsing this forum: C i l y, Warriorcats08 and 1 guest