Trade Rant thread V. 22 {New Thread!}

[WickedLullaby]

http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=23901961&userid=304567&signature=IA7M1-UWtL7od2p6U-1yPA a diff user their message

rat =/= populaer dogs

head desk i am overpayiong and he does have value!!!!

Actually, it's more unfair to the Malk. ouo
And you're certainly not overpaying.
And the rat doesn't have even nearly as much demand as a Malk.
It probably belongs in another thread...

i dont look at demend nor feed it

i look at value and my rat clear has more value

[Morticia]

Okay, so it's not bad.

However that dog is pretty darn hard to get -took forever- and that rat, frankly, has poor demand. Not to mention the pet was labelled NFT, but that was my fault for not locking it.

Then I get this PM:



sorry i didnt see the name of the pet but my rat is a 4th tair advent



First off, type like you actually care. Second off, don't talk to me like I'm a little kid. The 'look' subject just bothered me.
>And what does it matter? I already cancelled.

I got the exact same trade from the exact same person. They sent me a trade offering that rat for that same dog, which I politely canceled since I wasn't interested. Then they send me this pm:

my rat was overypay why not?

I responded saying:

I simply wasn't interested. Just because you offer overpay doesn't mean I'm required to accept.

It just seriously bugs me when people think that just because they're overpaying means I have to accept. It doesn't.
If I don't like your trade I have absolutely no obligation to accept it, whether it was overpay or not.

[Noel]

Okay, so it's not bad.

However that dog is pretty darn hard to get -took forever- and that rat, frankly, has poor demand. Not to mention the pet was labelled NFT, but that was my fault for not locking it.

Then I get this PM:



sorry i didnt see the name of the pet but my rat is a 4th tair advent



First off, type like you actually care. Second off, don't talk to me like I'm a little kid. The 'look' subject just bothered me.
>And what does it matter? I already cancelled.

I got the exact same trade from the exact same person. They sent me a trade offering that rat for that same dog, which I politely canceled since I wasn't interested. Then they send me this pm:

my rat was overypay why not?

I responded saying:

I simply wasn't interested. Just because you offer overpay doesn't mean I'm required to accept.

It just seriously bugs me when people think that just because they're overpaying means I have to accept. It doesn't.
If I don't like your trade I have absolutely no obligation to accept it, whether it was overpay or not.

-gives cookie-

I hate it when people think that by overpaying I have to accept. Especially when they aren't actually overpaying.

Also this.

[Foxtress]

Awwww, you bummer.
Do you know that you're the single line of red in a sea of white and green?
I mean, editing's not that bad. You could've simply replaced a few pets with less valuable ones and I wouldn'tve minded.

[November.Fox]

Old trade I'd forgotten about until it was auto canceled

I try not to let trades I don't like rot, but rather to cancel or edit, but.. Sometimes I forget o.o; But like.. I had to work to get those rares, and save them until now, don't you think I'd like an at least fair trade for them? When you add a Rare and Very Rare to my side? I'd expect at least one rare on yours >< Or, at the very least, a massive amount of uncommons (Unless from the same year, then only a few for the rare.) and maybe, maybe, some commons. C'mon, people, just because they're on my wishlist doesn't mean I'm accepting them as underpay :c

[Kecko]

-gives cookie-

I hate it when people think that by overpaying I have to accept. Especially when they aren't actually overpaying.

Also this.

I think I just died a little on the inside...O-O

[~ t r o u b l e ~]

http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=23901961&userid=304567&signature=IA7M1-UWtL7od2p6U-1yPA a diff user their message

rat =/= populaer dogs

head desk i am overpayiong and he does have value!!!!

Actually, it's more unfair to the Malk. ouo
And you're certainly not overpaying.
And the rat doesn't have even nearly as much demand as a Malk.
It probably belongs in another thread...

thats unfair to the rat. they are overpaying by at least an 09 rare. of not two.
the rat is low on the advent list due to demand. saying its worth even less than it is on the list, with demand already factored in, is just not right.

I really just dont understand why its so hard to read my rules.
no begging or chat speak and leave a message. its really not that hard!

[lucifer morningstar]

Exactly. The list takes demand into account. People undervalue rats so much. I'm not a particular fan, but I don't like how some people expect twice as much if offering a rat.

[lazulixi]

I love the 08 rats. Because they are realish looking.

[Noel]

Is it just with me, or do people only say that they 'judge pets based off demand' or 'only value pets by their looks' when the trade is unfair to you? I get plenty of trades with rats/spiders for dogs/cats with the 'I don't care about demand!' message, and many trades with a pretty uncommon or two for, say, my 'ugly' coontail or 'boring' sorbet. Never do I get trades offer dogs/cats for rats/spiders or 'ugly' rares for 'pretty' uncommons.

>I can never tell if pets on the list have demand factored in completely or not. So many times I'll send something that's a swap by the list, only to be told one pet goes for a certain amount more then the other, or be told it goes for pets higher/lower on the list. x_x
-> This is mostly my newbie-ness though.