- >Goes to trade with someone
>Finds Grey border Collie, cookie advent,Light grey husky,cream advent
>Offers on Light grey husky.
>Finds out its wishlist locked
>Doesn't have annything on there wishlist
BLAAAARRRRGGGGHHH

hellhunt wrote:Someones trade thread:Trading raity's chart:
2 omg so common= 1 very common(of same year)
2 very commons= 1 uncommon(of same year)
2 uncommons= 1 rare(of same year)
2 rares= 1 very rare(of same year)
5 very rares= 1 OMG so rare(of same year)
Changing rarity's threw years:
2012 Very rare=2011 rare and a half=2010 uncommon=2009 very common=OMG SO COMMON
2011 Very rare= 2010 rare=2009 uncommon=2008 OMG so common
2010 Very rare=2009 rare=2008 Very common
2009 Very rare=2008 Uncommon
So if you say you have a 2011 very rare and your wondering what its worth in 2012
2011 Very rare= 2012 Very rare and a half
2010 rare=2011 Very rare=2012 very rare and a half.
The HALF means you can get a very rare and a uncommon for it(or use Rairty chart)
Hopefully you get this.
Item trading(non store)
2012Item = 2012 common=2011 very common= 2010 omg so Common=2009=2008 worthless
2011 item=2012 uncommon=2011 common=2010 very common=2009 OMG SO COMMON=2008 worthless
2010 item=2012 rare=2011 uncommon=2010 common=2009 very common=2008 Omg so common
2009 item= 2012 very rare=2011 rare=2010 uncommon= 2009 common=2008 very common
Store items:
2012 Item= 2012 rare=2011 uncommon=2010 common= 2009 very common=omg so common
2011 Item=2012 very rare=2011 rare=2010 uncommon=2009 common=2008 very common
(if you dont know what year a item is from go to the help button go to Chickensmoothie wiki and go to the item tab.)
And trading rules of same person:1. "Never make a unfair trade like a lot of uncommons for a rare
2. "My owner believes in this rule A 2011 uncommon is worth more then a 2012 and a 2010 is worth more then a 2011 and 2012. 2008 r worth more then anything.
Backs away - have good luck trading with those rules....
Felicette wrote:hellhunt wrote:Someones trade thread:Trading raity's chart:
2 omg so common= 1 very common(of same year)
2 very commons= 1 uncommon(of same year)
2 uncommons= 1 rare(of same year)
2 rares= 1 very rare(of same year)
5 very rares= 1 OMG so rare(of same year)
Changing rarity's threw years:
2012 Very rare=2011 rare and a half=2010 uncommon=2009 very common=OMG SO COMMON
2011 Very rare= 2010 rare=2009 uncommon=2008 OMG so common
2010 Very rare=2009 rare=2008 Very common
2009 Very rare=2008 Uncommon
So if you say you have a 2011 very rare and your wondering what its worth in 2012
2011 Very rare= 2012 Very rare and a half
2010 rare=2011 Very rare=2012 very rare and a half.
The HALF means you can get a very rare and a uncommon for it(or use Rairty chart)
Hopefully you get this.
Item trading(non store)
2012Item = 2012 common=2011 very common= 2010 omg so Common=2009=2008 worthless
2011 item=2012 uncommon=2011 common=2010 very common=2009 OMG SO COMMON=2008 worthless
2010 item=2012 rare=2011 uncommon=2010 common=2009 very common=2008 Omg so common
2009 item= 2012 very rare=2011 rare=2010 uncommon= 2009 common=2008 very common
Store items:
2012 Item= 2012 rare=2011 uncommon=2010 common= 2009 very common=omg so common
2011 Item=2012 very rare=2011 rare=2010 uncommon=2009 common=2008 very common
(if you dont know what year a item is from go to the help button go to Chickensmoothie wiki and go to the item tab.)
And trading rules of same person:1. "Never make a unfair trade like a lot of uncommons for a rare
2. "My owner believes in this rule A 2011 uncommon is worth more then a 2012 and a 2010 is worth more then a 2011 and 2012. 2008 r worth more then anything.
Backs away - have good luck trading with those rules....
'2009 Very rare=2008 Uncommon'
xD? wat?
'2011 Item=2012 very rare`
Yes, dates matter, but...this much? Dx















Derpy HoovesΩ wrote:Sent a bid for a Shima Longtail. It's not the best but then again not the worst






Umalia wrote:*reads rules* Reasonable. Reasonable. Reasonable. Huh? A codeword? Nope. *abuses back button*
I understand why people think they need to use codewords, but they're obnoxious and noneffective.

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests