unfortunately the controversy may come to
you if one presses the subject tbqh. this site has a large christian population and i imagine many of them are similarly unimpressed to see this pop up with the name of christianity attached to it. geocentrism has been passe for quite a few centuries; a flat earth, for quite a few
millennia, if you ask the ancient greeks. neither system started out as christianity, and neither system makes terribly good christianity. (an aside because i can already hear one "but what about" - medieval scholarship, you must understand, is not so much about trying to figure out the truth around us, but rather categorizing that truth and trying to get it all to work within the same framework and system. when you've got ancient greek, ancient roman, late roman, anglo-saxon, viking, jewish, frank, middle eastern, muslim, pagan, indian, chinese, - okay, you get the idea. medieval scholars were more interested in making this all fit together, somehow. they did not create a tasty 7 layer dip of truth. it was more like a kitchen sink leftover scramble of sadness.) this, for the record, is not christianity. it hasn't been christianity since around 1600, and that's being generous. that is just geocentrism; a flat earth has been disproven much more thoroughly and actually was never common knowledge among basically any western civ peoples at any time, and i only say western civ because that is what i have been taught - however it is easily seen in any place that has a harbor, and ships big enough to see coming on the horizon, which is... bow-shaped, even to the human eye. i could go on here but, again, trying to avoid a full-drawn debate, and i'm getting the oddest feeling that whatever i may bring up will be pooh-poohed as lies and slander anyhow.
just your friendly reminder that although biblical verses are being used, this is not christian belief. believe me, the vatican worked this out quite thoroughly some time ago. you can ask them for full details.

one is free to express whichever position one so chooses on these boards, and i do not wish to start a big debate here in the least. but if one expresses strange opinions and hitches a certain philosophical term to them, it should be no surprise when someone like me comes by and says to the public that this is not standard by any means. you are free to believe as you choose; i will bother this thread no longer. i merely felt the need to make a clear and explicit point about the theology brought up here under a certain name.
an interesting piece of art nonetheless.