[IceFlurry]

Enjoy! For Spiritstar3!

[Spiritstar3]

XP
I get both?

[IceFlurry]

yes

[Spiritstar3]

XP Cool

[Silk.]

No offense, but the colors on the pups are just two of one of the parents' color swatches and then the other parent's patterns
Thats kind of lazy.. + I'm pretty sure that's not how genetics work. Also, I can tell you used bases, and they really aren't colored that well, sorry
Once again, I don't mean to be rude but I think it's just kinda lazy

[Spiritstar3]

Um, that's how I do some of mine, and you know many dogs in real life look like that too...

[Silk.]

Yes, but you have to actually go deep into genetics, like dominant and recessive traits
For example, say two people have some children(this would work the same with dogs, I'm just using humans as an easy example) The woman has dark hair for dominant and blonde hair as recessive, but the man has dominant red hair and blonde hair as recessive. If they have a child, it has a good chance of ending up as a blonde child. So, yeah. Some dogs could be an exact copy of their parents, I know that, but I have yet to see a dog with their parents color scheme and their other parents patterns(Unless it's the same breed of dog that's breeding, as this wouldn't count in this situation). I have also seen dogs who look nothing like their parents at all thanks to recessive. And if you don't want to follow genetics, at least TRY to make the pups more unique than just some color swaps between the parents. Like for example, in this situation, maybe one of the pups could be pink and light brown, or that creme yellow color and dark brown. I just wish you and Ice(and a lot of other people like you, believe me I've seen tons) would be a bit more creative with breeding. I seem rude, but I'm just generally annoyed, so, sorry for my rudeness if it seems that way.

[Spiritstar3]

Even if you say you don't mean to be rude, calling someone lazy is rude