missty0505 wrote:All the humans do on this planet is destroy it ._. I can go on but im not because I'll strike some nerves, all im gunna say is: animals keep their populations in balance, by say, natural selection; the sick, weak, old, and just plain not wise animals die off because they cant survive. They would get eaten, die of starvation, ect. and the populations stay down and steady because of these 'checks and balances', the genes that are strong continue... Now, do you see this in humans? No, because we have hospitals, and medication, life support, we keep alive people that wont live to a purpose, or are lifeless already..So we get over populated, and become..ya..
I think about this all the time. We're supposed to want to survive to breed, all animals are, yet with our adaptations we've become exceptionally good at it, which I think at some point will become a serious problem. All our special medications and whatnot are slowly replacing our natural immune system (or at least, it's aiding our immune systems). Perhaps someday we'll die out simply because a new disease will come about and we won't have medicine for it and our immune system won't be prepared.
wibeke wrote:Toadfoal wrote:Too bad we can't just bomb all their ships.
Killing the people isn't much better than killing the whales though. Sounds like a good idea, but human life is still important, even if they are killing the whales. If anyone drowned the Sea Shepherds would be in a lot of trouble.
I still like the idea though.
Too true, it's morally unacceptable (pardon my bad spelling skills) to destroy eachother in such ways. It would be "wrong", but then, you could argue that Japanese torture was also "wrong". Still, you're right.
























