Support, I think a second rr would definitely regulate the economy a bit
I also support adding store pets, there aint no way the skelebun is worth 8+ nons, thats so unrealistic and there shouldnt be that few in the game
Revla wrote:Support, I think a second rr would definitely regulate the economy a bit
I also support adding store pets, there aint no way the skelebun is worth 8+ nons, thats so unrealistic and there shouldnt be that few in the game
ACat wrote:Revla wrote:Support, I think a second rr would definitely regulate the economy a bit
I also support adding store pets, there aint no way the skelebun is worth 8+ nons, thats so unrealistic and there shouldnt be that few in the game
I read it's due to a bunch of players deleting them from the game a few years back in an attempt to artificially raise the rarity/worth (clearly it worked...)
Lanayru wrote:ACat wrote:Revla wrote:Support, I think a second rr would definitely regulate the economy a bit
I also support adding store pets, there aint no way the skelebun is worth 8+ nons, thats so unrealistic and there shouldnt be that few in the game
I read it's due to a bunch of players deleting them from the game a few years back in an attempt to artificially raise the rarity/worth (clearly it worked...)
I would love to see a source on this? There WAS an experiment to try to delete a specific pet to raise its rarity - however that pet was like, a common pony iirc and the deletions didn't actually affect its rarity at all.
I think rereleasing stores WILL have to happen at some point (because eventually, due to time, some oldest stores WILL be entirely unavailable), I just... can't think of a good/fair way to do it that wouldn't have some glaring downsides to it.
Users browsing this forum: Scarlet Janefox and 1 guest