Suggestion : Folders within a folder.

[calidogz]

Here's exactly what im thinking.

Many users who hoard, collect, & have multipule trade groups.. well.. have alot of confusing groups.
If we could make folders within folders, say, have a ''hoards'' folder, then everyone could put their hoards in that folder.

Basicly you have a mother folder and then a child folder in that one. I hope this makes sense ^^'

[dogtreat]

This function already exists in a limited way and quite a lot of people already use it or something similar.

You can make a Hoard "title" group, leave it empty (or fill it with a placeholder pet) and then make subgroups using numbers/letters. There's a few threads already about how to organize your pets (see this one for example) but here's how I organize mine, specifically using the Hoard group as an example.

[calidogz]

This function already exists in a limited way and quite a lot of people already use it or something similar.

You can make a Hoard "title" group, leave it empty (or fill it with a placeholder pet) and then make subgroups using numbers/letters. There's a few threads already about how to organize your pets (see this one for example) but here's how I organize mine, specifically using the Hoard group as an example.

I did this for quite a while, what im suggesting is a way to downsize the groups a user has. If you're trying to find a group of trades but the user has a million hoards (and some do) or they have them in hard-to-read fonts, its hard to find.

here is roughly what im suggesting. A dropdown off all the children groups branching off of the mother.

[CaptainSpank]

I did this for quite a while, what im suggesting is a way to downsize the groups a user has. If you're trying to find a group of trades but the user has a million hoards (and some do) or they have them in hard-to-read fonts, its hard to find.

I do like @dogtreat as well and even if it's not "perfect", that's the best we can get with the current System..., knowing they are sorted/displayed alphabetically...

"If you're trying to find a group of trades but the user has a million hoards":
=> Well, not-trade Groups should be locked by "that User", and "that User" should think about placing their Trade Group(s) at the Top or at the End of the Group Structure if they want other Players to trade "easily" with them...

"in hard-to-read fonts":
=> ... Well, their Groups will remain in "hard-to-read fonts", I'm afraid...

+ Having collapsible (Sub-)Folders with a User with many Unlocked Groups would require a lot of Clicking to open/scroll/scroll back to close/close / open the next Folder/maybe open some next Sub-Folder/scroll in both directions/close/close / etc..., while with the current System, we just need to scroll once to have a look at their open Groups... (if the "Pets on your WL" Group is too large)...

+ The Tree Structure will probably "get lost" if any Group/Folder is open for Trades (Everyone/Friends/WL) but some "higher Level" Group/Folder is locked (or more "restricted")...

[axelandria]

If I'm understanding correctly, this has already been suggested :)

[calidogz]

If I'm understanding correctly, this has already been suggested

I looked around but didnt see anything so I figured it'd be safe to post! Sorry about that ^^'

[reynard]

Please voice your support on the thread linked above! :)