
Anyways. as always my suggestion is more re releases.
Light Bringer wrote:Gadreel wrote:Log in incentives would absolutely boost activity! Especially if you're able to get a sweet pet or item at the end of it. I don't mean EVERY DAY log ins because people do have lives and are busy but something to try and achieve. Maybe even 1C$ every few days or weeks to help battle the currency situation and give those with no income a chance to get C$
Unfortunately i feel as though something like that would further diminish the value of C$ and make it even harder for most players, apart from the ones with tens of thousands of C$ to throw around.
freepan1 wrote:Honestly it's super hard not to "quit" for a few months to even a couple years temporarily occasionally when there isn't much to do.
Trading feels impossible, I appreciate the effort for the events but it's mainly what keeps me coming on to play, and Monthlies I don't even watch them grow like I used to. I remember back in 2013 I loved watching them grow I checked every day, now I check at the end of the month.... Sometimes.
everestwhite wrote:all i want to say, as someone who has been on this site for a very long time, its just way too difficult to get the pets you want. even years ago some pets were just far too difficult to for me to try and get to the point where i just gave up, although its certainly not anywhere nearly as bad as it is now. but it is always something ive struggled with on this site and i wouldnt be surprised if it pushes newer players away.
i think its fine for SOME pets to be rare and hard to get, but the weird artificial inflation on certain pets makes it feel truly impossible sometimes. i missed the golden gacha dog thing because i was lucky enough to get one from the litter, but i really feel bad for anyone who wanted it, seeing people talk about it makes it seem nightmarish to deal with and its just a RARE. not even a very rare! and its only like 2 years old!!
nowadays i dont bother. i just play the events a little bit and get my monthly litters. only time i do trades now is when people send them to me. it really just feels like a waste of energy.
all of this and also the lack of new content. i dont think it even has to be anything big, i enjoy how low maintenance this site is, but i gotta say nowadays its a hard sell and i have not been able to get any of my friends to play CS because theres just....nothing to do. just a small thing, anything, SOME kind of innovation, might do some good. seems like theres not enough manpower for it though...
all in all its sad to see the state of CS. i hope something can be done.
Gadreel wrote:Actually a limit on having extremely rare pets would help battle the circulation issue. Stopping players from having more than say 3 of the same super rare pet would help stop inflation from people hoarding.
Also suggesting a set of nick store pets with all profits going directly to Nick!
Logia wrote:SaschaR wrote:Lavish ❀ Lioness wrote:Every time I see someone say their only goal is to have a complete CS collection, my soul dies a little bit LMAO
Tbh me too. Like I want to collect every (non-store) snake but that's bc I genuinely like the snake design. CS is supposed to be fun not stressful! It's v disheartening seeing a lot of people complain about not getting rares from a pound drop in the CS server I'm in. Y'all got a cool looking pet, why so down?
I support people having whatever goal they want, but I feel like people should be educated (not the right word maybe) on how hard a complete collection will be and be made aware of other more reachable goals they can also have. I've never had any goals besides individual pets on my WL, so I don't share the frustration of not being able to collect all of something, but lately I've felt that CS has grown into this game where people think they "have" to collect all of something to be playing the game right.
Starry Night wrote:ARACHNOPHOBI4 wrote:onion wrote:i like the idea of a login reward but how would that work for people that stay eternally logged in like me? :0 just wondering haha!
I think as long as you appear on a rollover it counts would workOr make it more of an active system where you have to go click the "check in" button or complete a task.
cats135 wrote:Logia wrote:cats135 wrote:Hear me out. This is a collectors game. The goal shOuld be to...collect, and, realistically, complete a collection. But as stated here and in multiple similar threads...some pets are just...*impossible!*
The goal of this site is NOT to complete a collection. That would be impossible for all but a few players. The goal is whatever you want it to be. The only thing you "have" to do to be considered a player is collect a few individual pets. Personally I just collect outcomes I really like, and it has worked out great for me. I feel like there is a toxic culture of players thinking they HAVE to collect all of something or have to have a certain rarity. That's just not true. If you truly want to have a complete collection of all pets or a certain type, then go for it, but it is not the only way to play, and it's very restricting when people see it that way.
I understand! But I feel my point is more it shouldn't be impossible at *all* for even one person. If a single person out of thousands can't do it, then why advertise the site as a collectors site? No not everyone wants/hast to have every pet, but some pets shouldn't be *impossible* at all to get (And I'm not counting store or even OMGSRs). Average rares of high demand are often worth the same as a 2008/9 pet, and its just...difficult? Or it feels that way.
Still think this issue can be solved with more Dec 18th, mOre POUND OPENINGS, or that dice roll idea!
bungy7 wrote:Gadreel wrote:Actually a limit on having extremely rare pets would help battle the circulation issue. Stopping players from having more than say 3 of the same super rare pet would help stop inflation from people hoarding.
Also suggesting a set of nick store pets with all profits going directly to Nick!
Really glad people are bringing up hoarding being an issue tbh. I thought I was just being sensitive lol. But man, as someone who hasn't been on the site for as long as most other users have, it's really frustrating seeing people hoard tens or sometimes literal hundreds of ONE older or uncommon + pet and making them ridiculously hard to trade for, or just not trading them at all. If people are willing to trade off pets they have plenty multiples of without issue, I don't see a problem with it, but unfortunately it seems like that isn't the case with most hoarders.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests