What's wrong with Rarity? We want to explain

Need help with the site/forum/pets? Ask questions and get help from other members here.

Re: What's wrong with Rarity? We want to explain

Postby Nick » Fri Aug 15, 2014 4:37 am

Ethulai wrote:Please help me gain insight because I'm really quite frustrated (because I do a lot of C$ trading and now I feel cheated)

2012 Summer Event pet;
Image
Is now uncommon (was rare)

2013 Summer Event pet;
Image
Was rare, is still rare.

These were roughly the same difficulty to obtain.

I. Do. Not. Understand.


The rarity system can't measure "difficulty to obtain", it just counts pets on accounts. There are nearly twice as many of that first pet on accounts compared to the second pet, so it is marked as more common. Actually, that first pet is at the top end of the "uncommon" range, so it has only just barely now dropped down from being marked "rare".

The only real way for the rarity of pets to fall is for the number of "active players" to drop, since this is used to work out how many people are competing to collect pets. That's the number of accounts that have logged in within the last year. In 2013, we had a huge number of accounts sign up and then not do anything in May, June and July (possibly caused by spambots, about 2-3x as many as normal). So when the rarities were updated in the last couple of months, the number of new people who had joined the site in those months this year was about 50% less than the number of accounts that had gone inactive in those months in the previous year, so the count of the number of "active players" over the past 12 months fell for three months in a row. This meant that the "rarity" displayed on all pets fell slightly in those months.
User avatar
Nick
Admin
 
Posts: 6337
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2008 2:40 pm
My pets
My items
My wishlist
My gallery
My scenes
My dressups
Trade with me

Re: What's wrong with Rarity? We want to explain

Postby Nick » Fri Aug 15, 2014 4:38 am

Firedancer77 wrote:This stinks. Payment and contest prizes I had have gone from rare to uncommon. Why mods?

There's just as many pets available to trade for as there were before, only the labels have changed.
User avatar
Nick
Admin
 
Posts: 6337
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2008 2:40 pm
My pets
My items
My wishlist
My gallery
My scenes
My dressups
Trade with me

Re: What's wrong with Rarity? We want to explain

Postby raey » Fri Aug 15, 2014 4:54 am

Nick wrote:
Firedancer77 wrote:This stinks. Payment and contest prizes I had have gone from rare to uncommon. Why mods?

There's just as many pets available to trade for as there were before, only the labels have changed.


      thanks for the reply I would say =)
      But I still can understand most of the people. Even there are haven't changed anything in the pets that are available most peoples judges the pets after the labels and therefore it makes a huge difference if a pet is labelled as uncommon or as a rare. If a pets only says rare it is immediately worth more in the eyes of the users. Even the pet-amount hasn't changed the label still reduce the pet.
      It is quite interesting. Pets that had been rare you could trade of for pets worth more as when the same pet is labelled as uncommon - just because the people see the labels - therefore I can understand the rage of the many users (I'm myself pretty annoyed because half of my rare-trade fodder was dropped down and I won't get as good trades as before with the pets).

      But thank you very much for explaining
Image
User avatar
raey
 
Posts: 7859
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2010 4:56 am
My pets
My items
My wishlist
My gallery
My scenes
My dressups
Trade with me

Re: What's wrong with Rarity? We want to explain

Postby RavenclawHobbit » Fri Aug 15, 2014 4:54 am

Thanks, Nick! That makes a lot of sense.
Bring your daylight, bring your dark,
    ~~~~~~~Share your silence, and unpack your heart.

My DAMy Art BlogCharacter WebsiteAsk Gavin & Chase
About Me: Call me Raven or Meg, whichever you fancy. I'm female, vegetarian, a guinea pig owner, artist, and horseback rider. I love fandoms, from Harry Potter to Game of Thrones to Chaos Walking to Sherlock and most recently, Star Wars!. I don't log in as frequently as I used to, so please be patient when waiting for PMs and trades.
User avatar
RavenclawHobbit
 
Posts: 6160
Joined: Sun May 22, 2011 2:48 pm
My pets
My items
My wishlist
My gallery
My scenes
My dressups
Trade with me

Re: What's wrong with Rarity? We want to explain

Postby Shian » Fri Aug 15, 2014 5:03 am

I don't see how the rarity labels makes much of a difference when trading.
Rarity changes only seem to affect people that count and care about "how many rares they have" rather than "trade value of the pet".

Would you trade a 2013 common for a 2010 common? No! There's years difference!

Would you trade away your Shima long tail as a 2009 uncommon if it was still labeled uncommon? No. They're selling for rares list pets because they are harder to find despite having the exact same rarity as its littermates.


"I don't like it when rarities change! They should stay the same always so I don't lose anything!"

You're not losing anything. It's just a label that tells you roughly how many pets there are in the game. Not how many are tradeable. Rarity updates help gauge this though in this example:

"Oh, hey I have a rare!"

No you don't. It's not really rare. It's only labeled rare because there's thousands of spambots messing up the count by creating accounts and not adopting anything. Making the pet rarer than it really is. In reality, nearly everyone has this same pet you do and don't want to trade for it. Do you really want "false rares" like this where everyone has one but it's marked rare?
You'd still have a hard time trading it away no matter what it's rarity label is.
ImageImage
Come buy old rare pets in bulk for gems!
User avatar
Shian
 
Posts: 15086
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2008 7:36 pm
My pets
My items
My wishlist
My gallery
My scenes
My dressups
Trade with me

Re: What's wrong with Rarity? We want to explain

Postby raey » Fri Aug 15, 2014 5:10 am

      @Shian: true words. I think the same - but sadly most people don't
      Means - they still think the pet lost it's worth and even they are still the same value many won't see it the same way.
      It doesn't matter if you try to explain. They see "uncommon" and treat it like one even it's valued more.
      A devils circle...
Image
User avatar
raey
 
Posts: 7859
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2010 4:56 am
My pets
My items
My wishlist
My gallery
My scenes
My dressups
Trade with me

Re: What's wrong with Rarity? We want to explain

Postby Minimanta » Fri Aug 15, 2014 5:18 am

Ahh, so it's a possible spam bot problem that caused this sudden drop in rarities? Makes sense.
So I guess we should see the rarity updates back to normal soon? =3
If you can dream it, you can do it ~~ Walter Elias Disney
ImageImageImage
For every one minute you don't smile, you lose 60 seconds of happiness
User avatar
Minimanta
 
Posts: 18494
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2009 8:54 pm
My pets
My items
My wishlist
My gallery
My scenes
My dressups
Trade with me

Re: What's wrong with Rarity? We want to explain

Postby Lufi » Fri Aug 15, 2014 5:21 am

Shian wrote:I don't see how the rarity labels makes much of a difference when trading.
Rarity changes only seem to affect people that count and care about "how many rares they have" rather than "trade value of the pet".

Would you trade a 2013 common for a 2010 common? No! There's years difference!

Would you trade away your Shima long tail as a 2009 uncommon if it was still labeled uncommon? No. They're selling for rares list pets because they are harder to find despite having the exact same rarity as its littermates.


"I don't like it when rarities change! They should stay the same always so I don't lose anything!"

You're not losing anything. It's just a label that tells you roughly how many pets there are in the game. Not how many are tradeable. Rarity updates help gauge this though in this example:

"Oh, hey I have a rare!"

No you don't. It's not really rare. It's only labeled rare because there's thousands of spambots messing up the count by creating accounts and not adopting anything. Making the pet rarer than it really is. In reality, nearly everyone has this same pet you do and don't want to trade for it. Do you really want "false rares" like this where everyone has one but it's marked rare?
You'd still have a hard time trading it away no matter what it's rarity label is.


yeah i agreed with you... I don't have any problem that went that pets down in rarity and I'm very happy for some
I was just extremly confused it's all :)

also what are spam bots? its members which join and never are online? or it's that google "accounts"? :)
User avatar
Lufi
 
Posts: 29256
Joined: Thu May 06, 2010 2:00 am
My pets
My items
My wishlist
My gallery
My scenes
My dressups
Trade with me

Re: What's wrong with Rarity? We want to explain

Postby nickjr » Fri Aug 15, 2014 5:45 am

Lufik12 wrote:
Shian wrote:I don't see how the rarity labels makes much of a difference when trading.
Rarity changes only seem to affect people that count and care about "how many rares they have" rather than "trade value of the pet".

Would you trade a 2013 common for a 2010 common? No! There's years difference!

Would you trade away your Shima long tail as a 2009 uncommon if it was still labeled uncommon? No. They're selling for rares list pets because they are harder to find despite having the exact same rarity as its littermates.


"I don't like it when rarities change! They should stay the same always so I don't lose anything!"

You're not losing anything. It's just a label that tells you roughly how many pets there are in the game. Not how many are tradeable. Rarity updates help gauge this though in this example:

"Oh, hey I have a rare!"

No you don't. It's not really rare. It's only labeled rare because there's thousands of spambots messing up the count by creating accounts and not adopting anything. Making the pet rarer than it really is. In reality, nearly everyone has this same pet you do and don't want to trade for it. Do you really want "false rares" like this where everyone has one but it's marked rare?
You'd still have a hard time trading it away no matter what it's rarity label is.


yeah i agreed with you... I don't have any problem that went that pets down in rarity and I'm very happy for some
I was just extremly confused it's all :)

also what are spam bots? its members which join and never are online? or it's that google "accounts"? :)

Spambots are the reason that new members must have their first post approved before they can communicate. They're automated (hence the "bot" in their name), and their sole purpose is to post ads, spam, inappropriate content, etc. wherever and whenever they can. More information can be found via your preferred search engine and on Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spambot

The bots like the google bot, etc. are harmless as far as I know; their purpose is to collect information to help their search engine.

----

Thank you for the explanation, Nick. It'd be great if spambots weren't counted from the start, but I'm not too sure how that would work and it sounds like the problem wasn't expected xD But thanks again for explaining.
Spread the word to end the word, because discrimination based on perceived or actual IQ/"intelligence" is no better than discrimination based on race, gender, etc.

Context, consistency, and clear antecedents are golden.
I neither read nor speak between the lines. But I will analyze your language.


Often on phone |||| Timezone: EDT/EST (CS Time -4/-5) |||| Very turbulent life IRL
Intentionally turned off signatures; PMs off June 2013 - June 2020, may turn off again later
Image
Banner by Moonflight Image It's been over 10 years since my request, and I still love it. Thank you so much!

Character in avatar is from CS's 2015 Sucrose City summer event. Border made by me in MS Paint, Windows 8.1 xD
User avatar
nickjr
 
Posts: 7083
Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2008 10:54 am
My pets
My items
My wishlist
My gallery
My scenes
My dressups
Trade with me

Re: What's wrong with Rarity? We want to explain

Postby Firedancer77 » Fri Aug 15, 2014 5:50 am

Ah, okay Nick.

And the main reason I'm upset is because, while the worth may still be the same to me, people looking to enter might not be as appealed.
Image



Isle of Roses | Valley of Kings


One of these days a-coming, I'm gonna take that boy's crown

Cause I am, I am a little wicked
I am, I am
Hands red, hands red just like he said

I am a little wicked

No one calls you honey when you're sitting on a throne
User avatar
Firedancer77
 
Posts: 26334
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2013 12:46 pm
My pets
My items
My wishlist
My gallery
My scenes
My dressups
Trade with me

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: LizzieLuna, Vaseline and 37 guests