PikaPerfect wrote:I also struggle with seeing the difference between the bars, so, if I haven't said it already, support from me!
Also, here is a direct side by side comparison of the two colors:
And here is a more preferable palette:
ElementalInsanity wrote:TzatzikiTheLeg wrote:DaDwarf wrote:
There are all rarity labels C: As you can see, the star slowly goes up. IMO it's quite easy to see the difference between common and very common, not only by the color but also by the star. So no support from my side C:
I agree,there is no need to change the rarity bars,as it is not hard to understand which is which.Of course,as Shian said, it may be hard for a person to automatically realise what each bar stands for,but I still don't think a change is needed.If such a thing was needed so badly,it would've already been suggested and fixed.
Can I ask why you think it shouldn't be fixed? Just because some people can easily see the difference doesn't mean others can. Sure, you can look at the rarity words and see that, but not everyone can see the color and the star honestly doesn't move that much so it's of no help either.
Why not make a simple fix if people are having trouble with it? It is hard for some people to understand which is which, even if it isn't for you. Why should others have to "make do" or "Deal with it and look at the words"?
And to add, yeah. When they're side by side you can more easily see the difference. But not when they're separated. The star shifts so very subtly that it's of little help, and the colors look fairly similar when not right next to each other.
Shian wrote:Well I guess we're not getting it now that we have pets based on the rarity markers. Too bad. It really does influence trading in a serious way. Notice how when trading many people treat commons and very commons the same thing? That's because they're the same kind of green and people can't tell the difference.
TzatzikiTheLeg wrote:TzatzikiTheLeg wrote:I agree,there is no need to change the rarity bars,as it is not hard to understand which is which.Of course,as Shian said, it may be hard for a person to automatically realise what each bar stands for,but I still don't think a change is needed.If such a thing was needed so badly,it would've already been suggested and fixed.
I never said this shouldn't be fixed and I never said that people should deal with it.I said I don't think it is needed (as the small "title" exists),and many members (including me) are already used to the original color.So is it really worth to solve a problem by creating another one?
A nyan color could work,I guess,so if the majority of players in CS voted positive for a nyan tag I think it would be fair and I obviously wouldn't have the right to have a problem with something like that.
crumbledtower wrote:Honestly never had this problem. Mostly due to the text... text that is part of the rarity bar.
Nick wrote:And we've added little rarity bars underneath the pets while trading to make it easier to spot which pets are rare and which aren't .
Pyromaniacal wrote:Look. Look, look, look at this. It's easily distinguishable, muted enough to be easy on the eyes, and the change took me literally 10 seconds in an image-editing program. There is no reason this shouldn't be implemented. All the confusion over the rarity bar pups only further demonstrates how much these bars really need to change.
Pyromaniacal wrote:Look. Look, look, look at this. It's easily distinguishable, muted enough to be easy on the eyes, and the change took me literally 10 seconds in an image-editing program. There is no reason this shouldn't be implemented. All the confusion over the rarity bar pups only further demonstrates how much these bars really need to change.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests