Please note that I do not expect to get this position. However, I'm still posting an application because I think my ideas of how to overhaul the oekaki boards would be intensely useful. PLEASE TAKE MY IDEAS FOR YOUR OWN APPLICATIONS! Seriously. PLEASE.What date did you register as a CS member?:
Jan. 27, 2011.
How many posts have you made in the forum (at the time of applying):
5679
How many days a week do you usually visit CS?
6 days a week. Perhaps more like 6.75/week when averaged out throughout a month. I usually keep the tab open but there are occasional days I am busy with other things.
How many hours per day do you usually spend on CS, on a day that you do visit?
I usually keep it open in a tab among my many tabs to check regularly (tumblr, facebook, gmail, etc). I would estimate about an hour a day of actually staring at the website but this is broken up in lots of 5-15 minute periods to see if anything requires my attention.
Have you moderated on any other forums before?
Held positions in some roleplaying forums that are now, alas, long gone.
I am a founding officer of my World of Warcraft friends-and-family guild Farstriders.Have you ever used the CS oekaki to draw?
Yes.
Do you ever spend much time browsing the oekaki board just to look at the art posted there?
On occasion, yes.
Why do you want to be an oekaki moderator for CS?
Aah, and now we get to the meatiest, juiciest, most delicious part of the whole application.
There are problems crying out to be fixed. I want to help fix them.The first and most dire problem in my mind is the lack of firm standards. The difference between an intermediate and beginner's piece seems to be nebulous and varies from moderator to moderator. But Harpalyce, you might say, art is subjective! Well, yes, it is -
in part. But there are technical aspects that can be looked at from an objective standpoint. After all, you get a grade in art class, and it depends on a whole lot more than just whether or not the teacher likes you.
By making these standards clear and transparent, not only will people using the oekaki have better goals to work towards, but there will be a lot less arguments of people trying to mini-mod or people claiming that one mod favors them over another. A clear rubric will make things a lot easier on everyone involved.
What I propose for the transparent standards are thus -
For an oekaki to be in intermediate, it must demonstrate the majority of the following:
> A clear understanding of anatomy/proportion.
> Clean lineart or, if lineless, clearly defined subject of the oekaki through value and tone
> An understanding of tone and color - not paint-bucket-filled lineart with ‘white fuzzies’ on the inside
> Awareness of composition
> Clear subject matter (e.g., you can tell what it is)These are all things that can be relatively standardized and subjectively considered. And all of these things you can clearly work towards as a goal. You can find and link to tutorials about all of these things, and you can find definitions for them on wikipedia.
My first proposal is to put these standards up on all oekaki boards, linking to 1) the wikipedia entry explaining what is being looked at, 2) a tutorial explaining the basics of these things, and 3) an example of a popular oekaki that demonstrates this clearly.
Information and clarity will ultimately lead to fewer arguments.
Along with the rubric, I think it would be appropriate to clarify rules about blood/gore/nudity and link to some example oekaki pieces that are 'high water marks'. In other words, point to things that have already been done and say 'anything more than this is too much'. I for one am confused about how this rule seems to be applied unevenly and would welcome the chance to make sure we have things on the level.
The second thing I would like to put on every oekaki board - or at least the Intermediate board, where critique is specifically encouraged - is a sticky explaining how to make a 'critique sandwich'. ('Bread' of things you like around the 'meat' of something you think could be improved.) Right now much of the intermediate board seems to be allergic to critique, when critique is one of the specific things that makes the intermediate board different from beginner's.
Along with featured oekaki, I'd like to have a thread that showcases a featured critique of the week as encouragement to foster this artistic community.
The oekaki and artistic community that comes with it is part of what makes ChickenSmoothie truly unique among virtual pet sites. It's a good time to foster this in earnest.
While those are two major changes, I would also like to propose a slew of minor changes.
Among them would be a discussion about the originality of species, as a lot of intermittent ugliness pops up along those lines. There needs to be a general acknowledgement that two people can have similar base ideas without copying each other - e.g., 'I wanted to make a thing kinda like a wolf'. If people make two 'things like wolves', of course they're going to look similar, but it does not mean that some sort of villainous copycatting behavior has gone on, and it is NOT a call for a witch-hunt as so often happens. Similarly, putting a thing in armor is not an original idea and simply putting something in armor is not grounds for declaring someone a copycat or getting nasty towards them.
I'd also like to see a ten-minute minimum on the Beginners and Intermediate oekaki boards. I think this would cut down on some 'mindless' doodling. There aren't terribly many things under ten minutes on either board but having the minimum there is a strong statement that we expect people to try their best when putting things on those boards instead of just tossing off a five-minute doodle. That's what the Sketches and Experiments board is for, after all.
As long as we are discussing changes to structure of the boards, I think a sub-set of either Sketches and Experiments or Editables devoted entirely to redlines would be a fantastic addition. The ability to edit onto someone else's drawing already makes these boards suited to this idea, I just think that all of these redlines need a 'proper home'.
The oekaki needs an overhaul. Putting a little work up-front will make things much, much smoother for mods to come and can prevent future messes. I think it's very much worth the time and effort.
Can you think of any particular skills you can bring to the position (this is not required) (for example have you had any experience in peer mediation? Have you had a ton of experience using the oekaki program?)
I don't know if my minor notoriety and infamy is a plus or a minus here. Probably a minus, actually. But yes, my skill is Being Harpalyce, take that as you will.